The difference in using cluster vs. replication

In a replication setup, a master MySQL server updates one or more slaves. Transactions are committed sequentially, and a slow transaction can cause the slave to lag behind the master. This means that if the master fails, it is possible that the slave might not have recorded the last few transactions. If a transaction-safe engine such as InnoDB is being used, a transaction will either be complete on the slave or not applied at all, but replication does not guarantee that all data on the master and the slave will be consistent at all times. In MySQL Cluster, all data nodes are kept in synchrony, and a transaction committed by any one data node is committed for all data nodes. In the event of a data node failure, all remaining data nodes remain in a consistent state.
  • 1 Kasutajad peavad seda kasulikuks
Kas see vastus oli kasulik?

Seotud artiklid

Manage Database Roles

Solution Database roles are conceptually completely separate from operating system users....

Manage Tablespaces

Tablespaces in PostgreSQL allow database administrators to define locations in the file system...

ColdFusion DSN parameters are not updated

SYMPTOMS New CF DSN records are created.  Even the set of parameters is tried to be updated...

Finding what packages are installed on a Linux system

For distributions that use RPM format packages, use the command: $ rpm -qa You may want to pipe...

What platforms does Linux support?

Linux runs on almost every general-purpose computer made in the last 10 years. It runs on systems...